Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(collections): add comments for funcs #22214

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

xujk-byte
Copy link
Contributor

@xujk-byte xujk-byte commented Oct 10, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced functionality for encoding and decoding Quad and Triple instances to and from JSON format.
    • New methods added for string representation and size calculation of Quad and Triple instances.

These improvements facilitate better data handling and representation for users interacting with Quad and Triple data structures.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 10, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes introduce new methods to the quadKeyCodec and tripleKeyCodec structs within the collections package. These methods enhance the functionality for encoding and decoding Quad and Triple instances, respectively. The new methods include JSON serialization and deserialization, string representation, and buffer encoding/decoding, allowing for improved handling of these data structures.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
collections/quad.go Added methods for quadKeyCodec: EncodeJSON, DecodeJSON, Stringify, KeyType, Encode, Decode, Size, EncodeNonTerminal, DecodeNonTerminal, SizeNonTerminal, SchemaCodec.
collections/triple.go Added methods for tripleKeyCodec: EncodeJSON, DecodeJSON, Stringify.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:x/nft, C:x/consensus, C:collections

Suggested reviewers

  • facundomedica
  • akhilkumarpilli
  • julienrbrt
  • testinginprod

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
collections/triple.go (8)

Line range hint 88-106: Revise function comments to follow Go conventions

The comment for EncodeJSON should begin with the function name and be a complete sentence. According to Go conventions, it should be:

// EncodeJSON converts triple keys to JSON.

Please update the comment to match this style.


Line range hint 88-106: Handle nil pointers to prevent potential panics

In the EncodeJSON method, dereferencing *value.k1, *value.k2, and *value.k3 without checking if they are nil can lead to panics if any of the keys are nil. To prevent this, add nil checks before dereferencing:

func (t tripleKeyCodec[K1, K2, K3]) EncodeJSON(value Triple[K1, K2, K3]) ([]byte, error) {
	var json1, json2, json3 []byte
	var err error

	if value.k1 != nil {
		json1, err = t.keyCodec1.EncodeJSON(*value.k1)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, err
		}
	} else {
		json1 = []byte("null")
	}

	if value.k2 != nil {
		json2, err = t.keyCodec2.EncodeJSON(*value.k2)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, err
		}
	} else {
		json2 = []byte("null")
	}

	if value.k3 != nil {
		json3, err = t.keyCodec3.EncodeJSON(*value.k3)
		if err != nil {
			return nil, err
		}
	} else {
		json3 = []byte("null")
	}

	return json.Marshal(jsonTripleKey{json1, json2, json3})
}

Line range hint 108-132: Revise function comments to follow Go conventions

The comment for DecodeJSON should begin with the function name and be a complete sentence. It should be:

// DecodeJSON converts JSON to triple keys.

Please update the comment accordingly.


Line range hint 108-132: Validate JSON array length to prevent index out of range errors

In DecodeJSON, after unmarshalling, ensure that the JSON array has exactly three elements to prevent potential index out of range errors:

if len(jsonKey) != 3 {
	return Triple[K1, K2, K3]{}, fmt.Errorf("expected JSON array of length 3")
}

Line range hint 108-132: Handle null values during JSON decoding to support optional keys

If the JSON array contains null values, decoding into keys without handling null can cause errors. Modify the decoding to handle null values:

var key1 K1
if string(jsonKey[0]) != "null" {
	key1, err = t.keyCodec1.DecodeJSON(jsonKey[0])
	if err != nil {
		return Triple[K1, K2, K3]{}, err
	}
}

var key2 K2
if string(jsonKey[1]) != "null" {
	key2, err = t.keyCodec2.DecodeJSON(jsonKey[1])
	if err != nil {
		return Triple[K1, K2, K3]{}, err
	}
}

var key3 K3
if string(jsonKey[2]) != "null" {
	key3, err = t.keyCodec3.DecodeJSON(jsonKey[2])
	if err != nil {
		return Triple[K1, K2, K3]{}, err
	}
}

return Triple[K1, K2, K3]{&key1, &key2, &key3}, nil

Line range hint 134-170: Revise function comments to follow Go conventions

The comment for Stringify should begin with the function name and be a complete sentence:

// Stringify converts triple keys to a string.

Please adjust the comment to follow this format.


Line range hint 134-170: Simplify string concatenation using fmt.Sprintf for readability

Refactor the Stringify method to use fmt.Sprintf, enhancing readability and maintainability:

func (t tripleKeyCodec[K1, K2, K3]) Stringify(key Triple[K1, K2, K3]) string {
	k1Str := "<nil>"
	if key.k1 != nil {
		k1Str = fmt.Sprintf(`"%s"`, t.keyCodec1.Stringify(*key.k1))
	}
	k2Str := "<nil>"
	if key.k2 != nil {
		k2Str = fmt.Sprintf(`"%s"`, t.keyCodec2.Stringify(*key.k2))
	}
	k3Str := "<nil>"
	if key.k3 != nil {
		k3Str = fmt.Sprintf(`"%s"`, t.keyCodec3.Stringify(*key.k3))
	}
	return fmt.Sprintf("(%s, %s, %s)", k1Str, k2Str, k3Str)
}

Line range hint 88-106: Wrap errors with additional context per style guidelines

When returning errors, wrap them with context to improve debuggability, following the Uber Go Style Guide:

if err != nil {
	return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to encode key1: %w", err)
}

Apply similar error wrapping in other error handling blocks.

Also applies to: 108-132, 134-170

collections/quad.go (9)

Line range hint 110-133: Potential nil pointer dereference in EncodeJSON method

In the EncodeJSON method, the fields value.k1, value.k2, value.k3, and value.k4 are dereferenced without checking if they are nil. Since these fields are pointers, if any of them are nil, this could lead to a runtime panic. Consider adding nil checks before dereferencing to ensure robustness.

Apply this diff to add nil checks:

 func (t quadKeyCodec[K1, K2, K3, K4]) EncodeJSON(value Quad[K1, K2, K3, K4]) ([]byte, error) {
+    if value.k1 == nil || value.k2 == nil || value.k3 == nil || value.k4 == nil {
+        return nil, fmt.Errorf("one of the Quad keys is nil")
+    }
     json1, err := t.keyCodec1.EncodeJSON(*value.k1)
     if err != nil {
         return nil, err
     }
     // ... rest of the code ...
 }

110-110: Adjust function comment to follow Go conventions

The comment for EncodeJSON should start with the function name and be a complete sentence, as per the Uber Go Style Guide. Consider rephrasing it to:

// EncodeJSON encodes a Quad into JSON format.

135-135: Adjust function comment to follow Go conventions

The comment for DecodeJSON should start with the function name and be a full sentence. Consider rephrasing it to:

// DecodeJSON decodes JSON data into a Quad.

Line range hint 135-164: Potential issue with nil pointers in DecodeJSON method

In the DecodeJSON method, although it's unlikely, there is a possibility that jsonKey may not contain all four elements due to malformed input. Accessing jsonKey[0] to jsonKey[3] without bounds checking could lead to an index out of range panic. Consider adding a check to ensure that jsonKey has exactly four elements before proceeding.

Apply this diff to add a length check:

 func (t quadKeyCodec[K1, K2, K3, K4]) DecodeJSON(b []byte) (Quad[K1, K2, K3, K4], error) {
     var jsonKey jsonQuadKey
     err := json.Unmarshal(b, &jsonKey)
     if err != nil {
         return Quad[K1, K2, K3, K4]{}, err
     }
+    if len(jsonKey) != 4 {
+        return Quad[K1, K2, K3, K4]{}, fmt.Errorf("expected 4 elements in JSON array, got %d", len(jsonKey))
+    }
     key1, err := t.keyCodec1.DecodeJSON(jsonKey[0])
     // ... rest of the code ...
 }

166-166: Adjust function comment to follow Go conventions

The comment for Stringify should start with the function name and be a complete sentence. Consider rephrasing it to:

// Stringify converts a Quad into its string representation.

Line range hint 213-246: Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication in Encode method

The Encode method has repetitive code blocks for each key. To improve maintainability and adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle, consider refactoring the code by extracting the repeated logic into a helper function or by using a loop over the keys.

Here’s an example using a helper function:

func (t quadKeyCodec[K1, K2, K3, K4]) encodeKey(buffer []byte, key interface{}, codec interface{}, isTerminal bool) (int, error) {
    // Implement encoding logic based on isTerminal flag
}

func (t quadKeyCodec[K1, K2, K3, K4]) Encode(buffer []byte, key Quad[K1, K2, K3, K4]) (int, error) {
    writtenTotal := 0
    // Call encodeKey for each key.k1 to key.k4
}

Line range hint 247-278: Ensure consistent error handling in Decode method

In the Decode method, errors are immediately returned with minimal context. To provide better error messages, consider wrapping the errors with additional context using fmt.Errorf or errors.Wrap.

Apply this diff to enhance error messages:

 if err != nil {
-    return 0, Quad[K1, K2, K3, K4]{}, err
+    return 0, Quad[K1, K2, K3, K4]{}, fmt.Errorf("failed to decode key1: %w", err)
 }

Line range hint 279-312: Reduce duplication between Encode and EncodeNonTerminal methods

The EncodeNonTerminal method shares similar logic with Encode. Refactoring to share common code will enhance readability and maintainability.

Consider combining the methods or extracting shared logic, similar to the suggestion for the Encode method.


Line range hint 213-246: Adhere to Uber Go Style Guide on error handling and return values

Per the Uber Go Style Guide, when returning errors, it's recommended to wrap them with context. Additionally, ensure that the ordering of return values is consistent.

Also applies to: 279-312

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 04c1590 and 8497dba.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • collections/quad.go (5 hunks)
  • collections/triple.go (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
collections/quad.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

collections/triple.go (1)

Pattern **/*.go: Review the Golang code for conformity with the Uber Golang style guide, highlighting any deviations.

@julienrbrt julienrbrt changed the title docs:(quad.go, triple.go) add comments for funcs docs(collections): add comments for funcs Oct 10, 2024
@tac0turtle tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2024
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit 63b1652 Oct 10, 2024
70 of 72 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants